20 Comments
User's avatar
Murray Smart's avatar

The Roberts 6 are the WORST court in the history of America. In ruling after ruling (with rare exceptions, but even those have the most hardcore like Alito and Thomas) they rule AGAINST the people and FOR the CORRUPTION sweeping America under Project 2025 and the "Mar-a-Lago Mafia"! The present structure of the court MUST be Dismantled and Rebuilt to SERVE the PEOPLE and NOT the Wealth Special Interests! Everyone elected must be committed to DEALING with the Disaster that is the Roberts 6!!!!!!!!!!

Linda Leee E E's avatar

Weren't they required to take an oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America? Is it not ever so obvious that the Inauguration of our Felon President in January of 2025 was a break from allegiance to the Nation that they swore to serve? This has gone too far and these oath breakers must be disempowered and removed from our Government along with the others who have not been faithful to the oath of office. Call in the National Guard to protect and defend US ? In Congress July 4, 1776 " When in the course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to discover the political bonds which have connected them with another".

Linda Leee E E's avatar

Dissolve not discover! I guess that that discovery is where we're at nowadays.

clinton & susanne hollister's avatar

The one thing that would be most helpful now: Give the Supremes the same term limits as other politicians (since they have become politicians). No exceptions. Four years, and then a performance evaluation and MANDATORY 2/3 majority approval by Congress for one more term. No more after that. Lifetime appointments are one of the worst ideas ever. Even the best of judges should not have the freedom to carry on until they die, barring the way for anyone else. Murray, "dismantle and rebuild" is a great idea. It should include changing the whole structure, sweeping away the cobwebs of outdated traditions, clean house, and start over. BTW, that would work for the federal government, too!

Linda Leee E E's avatar

Benjamin Franklin said that we should have a revolution every 25 years to clear out the crooks, l understand that but now it's been 10 times that.

Doris Turner's avatar

Thank you, good one.

And lifetime has to go.

Paul thomas's avatar

These are the same illiterate judges that have allowed the sales of bumpstocks and recently overturned an Hawaii gun law by saying thre are no laws saying we the people can't make gun safety laws. The words granting regulatory rights were wrote in 1792. Before we had the right to keep and bear arms, Before militia we had "a well regulated " the first 3 words of the second amendment. In 1792 in the days of the musket the writers of the second amendment foresaw mans quest to have the biggest musket and first and foremost wrote a " a well regulated " second amendment. I can understand a lot of triggerhuggers not wanting to comprehend the first 3 words of the second amendment but the Supreme Court justices are supposed to read and comprehend the laws. I am sure they received a lot of kickbacks and bribes from the gun industry considering a dollar of most sales go to the n.r.a. wich is no longer a firearm safety organization. The Supreme Court needs to start working for we the people for whom the constitution was wrote.

Sandi Hebley's avatar

I don’t call them “supreme.” I just call them the Roberts Court!

David Balfour's avatar

To say this SCOTUS is partisan ,is stating the obvious.Let's make sure Tyrant Trumpolini and his Trumpkins (spineless GOP)do not return to office.

Sharon Wright's avatar

They know exactly what they are doing and who they are doing it for. They have been bought and they do the bidding of those who put them in these positions and given them bribes. They should be impeached for corruption. Even their “reasoning” makes no sense. They think we are all MAGA stupid.

Linda Leee E E's avatar

Bigger numbers of dollars is the only reason for corporate economic machines.

Fred Schwarzenbart's avatar

The only thing I would add to what you said is that the swiftness of the pearl clutching snowflaky reactions to the innocuous mention of who nominated them to them court is stunning to watch. 😭😭😭 we're not Trump judges or Obama judges😭😭😭. Their vision is so myopic they can't see their own partisan behavior right in front of them. Or so their gaslighting words tell us.

William Greenberg's avatar

Thanks you for so concise and characterization of these rascals! Readers (and yourself) might really enjoy I.F. Stone's little volume on the extremist Court of his day, titled "The Court Disposes," (1937). But as radical as they were, they at least accepted the Constitution as the law of the land, however grudgingly.

Our current Court sincerely believes it knows better, and had committed themselves to the task of rewriting it in order that our oligarchic overlords need never fear democracy again.

Neil Rankins's avatar

The fascist majority of the court are nothing more than racist oppressors in robes and outright criminals who are absolutely getting illegal perks, kickbacks, bribes, and felony payments sent directly to their offshore accounts. They need to be right at the top of the court docket at Nuremburg 2.0

Ted Forbes's avatar

Conservative thinking, reasoning, decision-making, and justification. Progressive thinking, reasoning, decision-making, and justification. In our America, who gets to impact our lives as individuals and as families, and for all our futures? And the impacts on our Earth's air, waters, soils, vegetation, and creatures - including humans? Authoritarian versus Authoritative ways of acting and planning. Commitment to authority before deciding, versus commitment to seeking verifiable knowledge before deciding? Anticipating the human and Earthly impacts before deciding, or not interested in any of that? RE-BALANCE the Supreme Court. REMOVE those who act for selfish reasons, and those who cannot or will not work to prevent harm to the lives and livelihoods of any creatures, or any of our earth's elements. TERM LIMITS, 6 years at most; three judges changed every two years. The mess we have as a "Supreme" Court is SHAMEFUL and unwarranted. Political games, both played and not taken part in when most needed, have given us what WE NEVER ELECTED.

Sandy Strano's avatar

The Antidemocratic "six" sitting on the Supreme Court are absolutely not ruling in favor of upholding the separation of powers, nor " We The People " Constitutional Rights according to our Constitution, its being dismantled.

Doris Buchmann's avatar

Their black robes need to become “Shrouds” now!! Cover their faces with them, and shove them out any window!!