34 Comments
User's avatar
Paul thomas's avatar

Save humanity by colonizing Mars ? Humanity doesn't have a chance if we can't figure out how to save planet Earth. The dinosaurs took better care of Earth than those parasites.

Michael Blackwell's avatar

Agree, and besides the ideas is preposterous. Between temperatures that kill, radiation levels that will sicken everyone who tries, an atmosphere that is unbreathable, and lacking any SciFi miracle terraforming device, our future on Mars will be nasty, brutish, and less than short. Musk(rat) is either delusional or throwing up (literally) pie-in-the-sky lies to further enrich himself at our expense. Not sure which is more likely. On the plus side, if he launched the effort in a bunch of Tesla trucks, at least one more eyesore other than he himself would be gone. Did he use a dumpster for its styling queues? Our future on Mars is to reality as the Tesla truck is to good design.

Paul thomas's avatar

Good comparison. The cyber trucks design doesn't allow for much cargo so it's torque is the only thing that makes it worth being called a truck.I like ugly trucks but not those. I get bored on Earth, can't imagine waiting 2 years for a steak to arrive.

wrknight's avatar

Colonize Mars? Just how long do you think humans would last on Mars without Earth total support?

Consider Mars resources. Low on oxygen, limited water, no fossil fuels, solar energy less than 1/2 (watts/sq. cm), no natural food supply. Now consider the natural resources on earth: abundance of oxygen, abundance of water, abundance of fossil fuels, abundance of natural food supply, abundance of exploitable minerals and metals and an abundance of arable land.

Given it's only taken about the last 300 years to destroy so much of our planet, how long do you think it would take humans to destroy Mars environment if they were to colonize it?

On top of that, how would humans produce the many simple but essential products that are made from oil and petroleum products, such as plastics, batteries, cleaning products, medicines, inks, lubricants, medical equipment and supplies, fertilizers, rubber products, synthetic fibers, and hundreds of other items that are derived from oil. All that would have to be shipped from earth - and how much would that cost? What would be the price of a simple comb for your hair?

These Mars colonizers are nuts! They could no more survive on Mars without continuous Earth support than they could live off the green cheese of the moon. And the drain on earth resources would exceed by a hundred times, what it would take to sustain the same population on earth. The whole idea is simply insane and would be laughable if it weren't so dangerous.

Paul thomas's avatar

Yup, the rapid increase in climate disasters has something to do with the rapid increase in rocket launches in the last decade. We would annihilate Earth's atmosphere just to get what's needed to Mars. Last year I watched space truckers with Dennis Hopper, this is the best depiction of what space travel will be like. After arriving at space port with his load of pigs that have grown square in their cages on the trip from Earth, he is offered half price ,take it or take it back to Earth. The pay toilets are back along with pay. Mirrors,pay sinks and pay everything but oxygen and there is probably an admission charge for breathing. The robber barons are bad on Earth but 2 years out in space they will be ruthless. Anyone who doesn't see this coming can't see.

Patricia DeVea's avatar

Yes--laughable if it weren't so dangerous!

John Kumm's avatar

For a technically trained person, Musk has surrendered his objectivity to his ego and avarice. He has the resources to make our civilization on earth more sustainable, but his penchant for griftiosity is behind his contention that the only way for humans to survive is to become interplanetary.

Paul thomas's avatar

Humans have survived a long time on one plAnet. Earth would be more sustainable if musk hadnt blasted so many starlink sattelites into orbit.we survived along time without starlink, I think its main purpose is to track and control us. It's been a couple weeks since A.I. went rogue and hacked into another A.I. I think the dinosaurs would do better at helping humanity survive than musk and ilk.time to see where the odds are in the prediction betting sites.

Ian Ogard's avatar

If humanity's answer to its destruction of Earth is colonization of other planets, the colonization will be like the spread of a cancer on a cosmic scale.

Linda Nelson's avatar

I wish Elon would just go on and blast off to Mars, and take Jeff Bezos with him. Then at least half the disgusting sludge of public life and private engorged wealth would be outa here.

Joanne's avatar

Oh please, include t

Brian Elvin's avatar

Like the Robber Barons of the Guilded Age without the Publc Libraries and Public Parks

Algo Mas's avatar

I wouldn't trust a "high-tech billionaire" to wash my car if he/she paid me.

Marie Hoff's avatar

THANK YOU JIM FOR SPEAKING TRUTH TO POWEER. I STRUGGLE TO MAINTAIN HOPE THAT HUMANITY CAN LEARN TO LIVE SUSTAINABLY AND RESPECTFULLY ON OUR BEAUTIFUL PLANET, THE ONLY ONE WE KNOW FOR SURE CAN SUSTAIN SUCH RICH LIFE!!!!!

John Kumm's avatar

If you want to feel less bad about the power Elon Musk has, don't watch his 90-minute interview with Zanny Minton Beddoes. At 55, Musk is all teenager. The world is easy to understand, and he groks it and predicts the future, better than anyone else. The evil in the world, challenging our bright future, is the fault of governments and the media. Yet he expects them to paternalistically swoop in and, despite the avarice of the techno/kloptocrats and VCs, to prevent the destruction of civilization by AI. I agree, the sooner he goes to Mars, the better for the rest of us.

TruthBeTold's avatar

A very important observation extremely well stated

Patricia DeVea's avatar

Hands clapping for that one!

wrknight's avatar

"The evil in the world, challenging our bright future, is the fault of governments and the media."

But he and his fellow oligarchs own the media and control the politicians who run the government. So whose fault is that?

Fred Schwarzenbart's avatar

Send them all off on a rocket to Mars? Convince them we've invented a personal force field and they can,as a group, be the first to test it out on a trip over Niagra Falls?

Neil Rankins's avatar

It seems to me that converting the current sociopathy to socialism wouldn't be such a bad thing...a reasonable amount for all, instead of grabbing all for a few. Just saying.

Ian Ogard's avatar

On a cosmic scale there’s a long stretch of time before humanity, then there’s the flash of time when we’re here, and then there’ll be another long stretch when we’re gone. When I think about all that, sometimes I feel like life might be pointless. We’re in an instant in eternity. We’re on a speck in infinity. And we’re all bound to become part of another cosmic cloud of dust. So sometimes I feel like nothing we do matters.

But that’s wrong. Everything we do matters. The choices we make and the actions we take shape our reality, and they impact the reality of everyone around us. So that instant on the speck that we’ve got isn’t nothing. It’s everything.

Elon Musk and all the other billionaires who spend their lives exploiting humanity, pillaging the planet, and hoarding wealth are wasting their existence.

Rich Sprecher's avatar

I hope Elon is the first human to colonize Mars. He appears to believe there is enough oxygen left on the planet to establish an atmosphere that will sustain him and his colonists. If all of the folks who can afford the ticket go on that first trip we would be better off back home. All in favor say Aye! Rich S. Octogenarian and Contrarian and can balance a chemical equation.

TruthBeTold's avatar

But we support them in so many ways. Today I read that Meta has chosen Newsmax (the American version of Izvestia or Der Angriff) as a source for its data base. How many reading this column do or have in the past contributed to Zuckerberg's fortune. I have lost count of how many progressive candidates have asked for my support, giving me the option of "liking" them on Facebook or taking other acts that put money in plutocrats' pockets. I once challenged a candidate on this point and was told that it was a campaign necessity. in other word, he was putting expedience above principle.

John Kumm's avatar

I agree, Meta is evil incarnate and anyone who uses their platforms is promoting the growth of that evil. Facebook, Instagram and the other assorted Meta enterprises are neither useful nor necessary.

Doris Buchmann's avatar

Fit them, one by one, into the dryers at the White House laundry! There are specialized machines there!! Cheap, too!

Paul thomas's avatar

That is really dirty laundry. Time to crank out "hang me out to dry "by Karl Densons tiny universe

Julie Putney's avatar

Works for me! Send him to Mars in one of his crappy rockets

Oakwalker's avatar

No one who 'could' is motivated to save 'us', only themselves.

David Balfour's avatar

Restore sanity!

Muskrat and Tyrant Trump are disingenuous(liars).Juist say "NO" to anything pertaining to them.

Save your family,your health and our planet!!!

Rafi Simonton's avatar

That none of us approve is proof of our inferiority. These postmodern Robber Barons are the heirs of the 1880s and/or 1920s and/or 1980s and/or the claim to be entirely self made, thus the products of superior genes, culture, and abilities only the greatest of winners have. Social Darwinism at its finest. Obviously they should rule.

They approve of the assumptions this econ system is based on. Devastation of communities and ecosystems are externalities; they don't count. Of course not--human and natural resources are just things to be used up for what does count: corporate profit. The only real motivation is the utility function, individual personal gain. Only fools and hypocrites believe otherwise.

Adjusting the econ system to fit sporadic ecological changes would be massively expensive and very disruptive to productivity. Thus no real reason to do so. The counter info on climate change has worked to create some confusion, enough to buy time. Buying political parties also helped. Although they are preparing just in case by buying megayachts and private islands. If the worst happens and brown hordes from the global South try to flee north, the refugees will be met by trained military troops and armed vigilantes. Survivors will be properly submissive, grateful to become neo-serfs for their neo-fiefdoms; explicit rule by wealth and family. As history shows it should be.